A Tale of Two Airlines:
In recent years, the aviation industry has come under increasing scrutiny for its environmental impact. With growing pressure to reduce carbon emissions and operate more responsibly, airlines worldwide are embracing sustainability as a strategic priority.
Among Southeast Asia’s flagship carriers, Malaysia Airlines and Singapore Airlines stand out not only for their service quality but also for their evolving approaches to sustainability. This article explores and compares their sustainability initiatives across key dimensions: environmental stewardship, operational efficiency and social and governance commitments. It also indicates how sustainability impacts financial performance.
1. Environmental Stewardship
Singapore Airlines, (SIA) has taken a leadership role in environmental sustainability It was one of the first in Asia to introduce Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF) at Changi Airport and invested heavily in fuel efficient aircraft such as A350 and Boeing. Its sustainability roadmap includes clear targets, public disclosures, and ISO 14001-certified environmental management systems.
Malaysia Airlines, Under the Malaysia Aviation Group (MAG), has committed to zero emissions by 2050. It has made progress in fleet modernization and operational fuel efficiency. However, its environmental strategy is less detailed and less publicly transparent compared to Singapore Airlines, with limited reporting on emissions reductions or sustainable fuel use.
Comparison: While both airlines are aligned with the net-zero 2050 vision, Singapore Airlines demonstrates greater depth and transparency in its environmental reporting and innovations, such as early adoption of SAF and formal environmental certifications.
2. Operational Efficiency
Singapore Airlines (SIA) integrates sustainability into daily operations through AI-powered meal planning, lightweight cabin materials and digital optimization tools. These efforts reduce waste and improve fuel efficiency.
Malaysia Airlines has introduced digital flight documentation and is phasing in more efficient aircraft, but it lacks the scale and innovation of SIA’s initiatives. Waste reduction programs and green procurement are still in early stages.
Comparison: Singapore Airlines excels in integrating technology and innovation to drive sustainability, reflecting a more proactive and forward- looking approach compared to Malaysia Airlines, which is still in its early stages of many operational green practices.
3. Social and Governance Commitments
Singapore Airlines maintains strong ESG governance, with sustainability integrated into board-level oversight and regular stakeholder reporting. Kits workforce polices emphasize training inclusion and health.
Malaysia Airlines supports local communities and maintains a diverse workforce, reflecting Malaysia’s demographics. However, its governance structure around sustainability is less mature and less visible to the public.
Comparison: Singapore Airlines demonstrates a more integrated and transparent ESG governance structure, while Malaysia Airlines focuses more on community-level initiatives and national alignment.
Comparative Analysis of Financial Performance
In the fiscal year 2024, both Malaysia Airlines and Singapore Airlines navigated a complex aviation landscape marked by fluctuating demand, operational challenges and evolving market dynamics. While both carriers achieved profitability, their financial outcomes differed significantly.
Singapore Airlines achieved a net profit of S$ 2.675 billion1, a 24% increase year-on-year, making it the highest in the airlines history. Its operating profit was S$ 2.728 billion2, up 1.3% from the previous year. Its revenue was S$ 19.013 billion3, a 7% year on year increase.
Malaysia Airlines (MAG) on the other hand achieved a new profit of RM 54 million4, down 93% from RM 766 million the previous year. Its operating profit was RM 113 million5, a 87% decrease year on year. Its revenue was RM 13.68 billion6, a marginal decrease from the previous year.
The comparative analysis above suggests that there is a moderately strong and growing positive correlation between sustainability and financial performance in the aviation industry , especially when sustainability is embedded strategically and not treated primarily from a compliance perspective.
Overall Conclusion
Both Malaysia Airlines and Singapore Airlines are making strides toward sustainability, but the scope and maturity of their approaches vary significantly. Singapore Airlines stands out as a regional sustainability leader, thanks to its investment in SAF, robust reporting practices, and operational innovations. Malaysia Airlines, while showing commitment to greener practices, lags in transparency and systematic implementation. Consequently its financial performance compared to Singapore Airlines is significantly lower.
New to sustainability in project management?
Start with our complimentary course – Introduction to Sustainable Project Management – designed to give you a strong foundation in sustainable practices before diving deeper.
Can your next project deliver economic growth, protect the planet, and benefit local communities—all at once?
Our Sustainable Project Management course, led by industry experts, equips you with the tools to embed environmental, social, and economic impact into every phase of your project lifecycle.
Citations
- Wall Street Journal, Kimberly Kao, Singapore Airlines FY24, Net 2.675B, 15 May 2024
- ET TravelWorld.com, Singapore Airlines Group records highest ever full year profit of USD 2.67 Billion
- ET TravelWorld.com, Singapore Airlines Group records highest ever full year profit of USD 2.67 Billion
- Aeronews Journal, Malaysia Airlines secures Third Consecutive Year of Profitability in 2024
- The Sun.my, Malaysian Aviation Group posts RM 54 million net profit in 2024 despite Q4 capacity cut
- The Edge Malaysia. Malaysian Aviation Group posts RM 54 million for FY 2024, its second straight annual profit
