Transitioning from directive to collaborative approach to project management;The key to reducing delays in infrastructure projects in Malaysia.

From a cultural standpoint, government agencies as well as contractors tend to place a high value on hierarchy and respect for authority, which lead to operational impediments such as lengthy and multi-layered approval processes for scope related changes.
The structural framework within which projects are undertaken are often highly bureaucratic. Such structures institutionalise operational impediments such as inefficiency, incompetence, and a lack sense of urgency to expedite projects.
The predominance of such cultural and structural frameworks erodes individual and team-based accountability. Consequently, reluctance to take ownership exacerbate operational impediments that cause project delays. Such delays include delays by regulators in processing and approval in permits, delays by consultants in finalising designs as well as delays by contractors in implementing scope changes.
Collectively, the cultural, structural and operational impediments listed above often interact, compounding their effects and leading to significant delays in the completion of infrastructure projects.

When projects are undertaken based on an autocratic culture within a bureaucratic structure a tendency for government agencies as well as government appointed consultants who are the clients to direct contractors, consultants, vendors and suppliers who affect the project prevails. This is defined as a directive approach to project management as illustrated in the diagram below.

It is proposed that such a directive approach is gradually transitioned into a collaborative approach where all stakeholders including government agencies work collaboratively to reduce project within the realm of a high-performance culture. In this instance, efficiency, accountability, and a sense of urgency is actively promoted at all levels as per the diagram below.
